The Kevin Trudeau Show: 12-17-11
Have you ever realized just how corrupt all these drug companies are? Kevin explores why some drug companies are too big to nail! Plus, the author of Undateable, Anne Coyle, stops by to reveal the secret list of over 311 things that perfectly eligible guys manage to wear, say, or do to make themselves completely undateable. Click here to learn more about Anne Coyle and her hilarious, but overly educational book!
Health:
Monsanto GM Seed Ban Overturned By US Supreme Court
Radiation Causes Breast Cancer
Pain Relievers Can Raise Heart Risks
10 Foods You Should Never Eat
Eating Disorder Label Leaves Many Untreated
Trans Fats and Partially Hydrogenated poison
People Are Finally Waking Up And Looking To Alternative Medicine
Once Scarce, H1N1 Vaccines Now Trashed
Government:
Obama’s Aunt Wins Asylum, Stays In US
Fake Pilot Flew Passenger Jets For 13 Years
Too Many Judges Want Authority Beyond Their Constitutional Role
NWO:
Feds Find Pfizer Too Big to Nail
Wealth:
Spirit Airlines To Charge $45 For Carry-Ons
Everything Kevin:
Become An Insider!
Kevin is on YouTube!
Sign Up For Kevin’s FREE Podcast
Follow Kevin on Twitter
Become Kevin’s Friend on Facebook
Kevin’s Film Club
Kevin’s Book Club
Take Trudeau on the Go! Click here to download this show to your iPod, mp3 player, or PC through iTunes!
Click Below to Watch the Kevin Trudeau Show LIVE!
The Kevin Trudeau Show: 9-24-11
Today, find out who Kevin calls the biggest drug pushers in America, and what the solution is to fix all the problems in this country!
Plus, the author of Undateable, Anne Coyle, stops by to reveal the secret list of over 311 things that perfectly eligible guys manage to wear, say, or do to make themselves completely undateable. Click here to learn more about Anne Coyle and her hilarious, but overly educational book!
Health:
Monsanto GM Seed Ban Overturned By US Supreme Court
Radiation Causes Breast Cancer
Pain Relievers Can Raise Heart Risks
10 Foods You Should Never Eat
Eating Disorder Label Leaves Many Untreated
Trans Fats and Partially Hydrogenated poison
People Are Finally Waking Up And Looking To Alternative Medicine
Once Scarce, H1N1 Vaccines Now Trashed
Government:
Obama’s Aunt Wins Asylum, Stays In US
Fake Pilot Flew Passenger Jets For 13 Years
Too Many Judges Want Authority Beyond Their Constitutional Role
NWO:
Feds Find Pfizer Too Big to Nail
Wealth:
Spirit Airlines To Charge $45 For Carry-Ons
Everything Kevin:
Become An Insider!
Kevin is on YouTube!
Sign Up For Kevin’s FREE Podcast
Follow Kevin on Twitter
Become Kevin’s Friend on Facebook
Kevin’s Film Club
Kevin’s Book Club
Take Trudeau on the Go! Click here to download this show to your iPod, mp3 player, or PC through iTunes!
Click Below to Watch the Kevin Trudeau Show LIVE!
The Kevin Trudeau Show: 8-20-11
Today, Kevin gives you a lesson on how to negotiate and what to do when given an opportunity of a lifetime! Plus, get the natural cures for depression and the three ways a person becomes financially free. Which route will you take?
Self Help:
Create A Cash Cow
Healthy Hair Dye
Get Rid Of Emotion Pain
Protection From Toxins
Omega-3 Fish Oil
Oral Chelation
Organic Cheese
Health:
FDA Admits Heartburn Drugs Cause Brittle Bones
Animals With Antennae Are Vanishing In Epidemic Amounts
The Truth About High Fructose Corn Syrup
College Kids Are Depressed
Number One Killer In America Is Heart Disease
Depression Is Fastest Growing Disease
Everything Kevin:
Become An Insider!
Support Kevin!
Kevin is on YouTube!
Sign Up For Kevin’s FREE Podcast
Follow Kevin on Twitter
Become A Fan of Kevin on Facebook
Take Trudeau on the Go! Click here to download this show to your iPod, mp3 player, or PC through iTunes!
Click below to watch the Kevin Trudeau Show!
Author Exposes Organizations for Losing War Against Cancer
June 14, 2011 by admin
Filed under News Stories
June 14, 2011
Natural News
Neev M. Arnell
A new book by leading cancer expert, Dr. Samuel S. Epstein, skewers the National Cancer Institute and American Cancer Society and blames the organizations for America losing the war against cancer.
In the book, “National Cancer Institute and American Cancer Society: Criminal Indifference to Cancer Prevention and Conflicts of Interest,” Epstein argues that the NCI and ACS have spent tens of billions of taxpayer and charity dollars focusing on treatment to the exclusion of prevention, which has allowed cancer rates to skyrocket, with the disease now affecting nearly one in two men and more than one in three women. Furthermore, the author claims that not only do numerous conflicts of interest exist within the NCI and ACS, but the NCI and ACS are also withholding a mass of information on avoidable causes of cancer.
Epstein, who has served as a consultant for the U.S. Senate Committee on Public Works, is an internationally recognized authority on avoidable causes of cancer, particularly carcinogen exposure through conduits such as food, air, water, household products, cosmetics, prescription drugs or industrial carcinogens in the workplace.
Click here to read the full report from NaturalNews.com.
The Kevin Trudeau Show: 1-13-11
Today, Kevin finally reveals exactly how he developed his wealth and where he has invested that wealth to create even more!
Self Help:
Change Your Life
You Can Win Too!
Create A Cash Cow
Health:
FDA Admits Heartburn Drugs Cause Brittle Bones
Animals With Antennae Are Vanishing In Epidemic Amounts
The Truth About High Fructose Corn Syrup
Everything Kevin:
Become An Insider!
Kevin is on YouTube!
Sign Up For Kevin’s FREE Podcast
Follow Kevin on Twitter
Become Kevin’s Friend on Facebook
Take Trudeau on the Go! Click here to download this show to your iPod, mp3 player, or PC through iTunes!
Click Below to Watch the Kevin Trudeau Show LIVE!
PayPal Drops WikiLeaks Donation Account
December 6, 2010 by admin
Filed under News Stories
December 6th, 2010
The Wall Street Journal
By: Julian Barnes and Jeanne Whalen
PayPal, the online payment service, on Friday joined a growing number of companies which either pulled or threatened to pull Internet-support services to the controversial document-leaking website.
PayPal, owned by online auction giant eBay Inc., said in a statement on its blog that it has permanently barred a donations account used by WikiLeaks because it had violated the service’s “acceptable use policy.” That policy states “our payment service cannot be used for any activities that encourage, promote, facilitate or instruct others to engage in illegal activity.”
A PayPal spokesman was not immediately available for comment beyond the terse statement, which otherwise said only WikiLeaks had been notified of the action.
PayPal’s move is a major blow to WikiLeaks, which has raised much of its funding through small donations processed by the payment system. WikiLeaks’ website says it still accepts donations by bank transfer, and via credit-card payments processed by a firm called Datacell. It also accepts checks at a post-office box in Australia.
WikiLeaks had a brief hiccup with PayPal once before, when PayPal demanded explanations for a surge and subsequent fall in donations to WikiLeaks.
On Friday, WikiLeaks’ Internet domain name, wikileaks.org, was inaccessible after a U.S. domain-name service provider, EveryDNS.net, said it had withdrawn service to WikiLeaks.
Meanwhile, France’s industry minister said France was planning to stop a French company, OVH SAS, from hosting the WikiLeaks site, which he described as “criminal.”
The news followed Amazon.com Inc.’s decision earlier this week to stop hosting WikiLeaks from its Web servers after pressure from members of Congress. Amazon denied that government pressure played a role, saying that WikiLeaks violated Amazon’s “terms of service” by posting material it didn’t own, and that could cause injury to other people. WikiLeaks also uses servers in several European countries, including Sweden and Belgium.
On its Twitter feed, WikiLeaks posted a tweet from one of the founders of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a non-profit group that advocates internet freedoms: “The first serious infowar is now engaged. The field of battle is WikiLeaks.”
WikiLeaks managed to partly maneuver around the problems, posting a numerical Internet Protocol, or IP, address on its Twitter feed to help the public reach WikiLeaks by a different route. It also moved its main site to a new Swiss address—wikileaks.ch—and posted the address on Twitter.
WikiLeaks’ nomadic moves mirrored those of its founder, Julian Assange, who has moved from country to country in recent months, and kept out of sight in recent days, as pressure on him has mounted. He popped up briefly Friday to do an online interview with readers of the Guardian newspaper, saying he and some colleagues were “taking the appropriate precautions” to safeguard themselves against “the threats against our lives.”
WikiLeaks’ publication of hundreds of thousands of secret U.S. government documents in recent months has provoked anger in some quarters, with several U.S. politicians calling for Mr. Assange’s prosecution.
Mr. Assange is also under pressure from Swedish authorities, which have issued a European Arrest Warrant calling for his detention. They want to question him on allegations that he raped one woman and molested another during a visit to Sweden this summer. He denies the allegations and calls them part of a “smear campaign.”
A series of anonymous “denial of service” attacks on WikiLeaks have also undermined the Web site’s ability to function in recent weeks. People coordinating such malicious attacks use a network of often virus-infected computers to make multiple requests to call up a website, which can overwhelm the site.
EveryDNS.net said the attacks forced it to stop supporting WikiLeaks’ domain name at 10 p.m. EST on Thursday. The attacks “threaten the stability of the
EveryDNS.net infrastructure,” which serves 500,000 websites, the group said. The move meant that Internet users couldn’t access the site as usual by typing wikileaks.org. EveryDNS.net said it sent WikiLeaks a warning notice 24 hours in advance. “Any downtime of the wikileaks.org website has resulted from its failure to use another hosted DNS service provider,” EveryDNS.net said.
On its Twitter feed early Friday, WikiLeaks said: “WikiLeaks.org domain killed by US everydns.net after claimed mass attacks KEEP US STRONG.” The tweet linked to a donations page for WikiLeaks.
Responding to the French minister’s demand that it stop hosting WikiLeaks, meanwhile, OVH founder Octave Klaba said he discovered via the press his company’s infrastructure was hosting Wikileaks.
“The system is fully automatic and works 24/7,” Mr. Klaba wrote on an OVH employee forum. “OVH is neither for nor against this site.”
OVH’s next move will be to ask a French court to rule whether the site is legal or not, Mr. Klaba added, without specifying which court. “We hope the judge will give his decision before tonight or tomorrow. And OVH will implement the decision immediately,” he wrote. Mr. Klaba wrote that his client had paid less than €150 (about $200) for OVH’s services.
Click here for the full report from the Wall Street Journal
New British Ad Campaign claims Use of Cash to be an Act of Terrorism
March 12, 2010 by admin
Filed under News Stories
March 11, 2010
InfoWars
By Paul Joseph Watson
A new government commercial currently running on one of Britain’s most popular radio stations is selling one thing – fear – by encouraging Londoners to report their neighbors as terrorists if they use cash, enjoy their privacy, or even close their curtains.
The advertisement, produced in conjunction with national radio outlet TallkSport, promotes the “anti-terrorist hotline” and encourages people to report individuals who don’t talk to their neighbors much, people who like to keep themselves to themselves, people who close their curtains, and people who don’t use credit cards.
“This may mean nothing, but together it could all add up to you having suspicions,” states the voice on the ad, before continuing “We all have a role to play in combating terrorism” (we’re all indentured stasi informants for the government).
“If you see anything suspicious, call the confidential anti-terrorist hotline….if you suspect it, report it,” concludes the commercial.
That’s right, if you are trying to stay out of debt by not having a credit card, you’re obviously a prime candidate to be a suicide bomber.
If you’re watching television or using a computer monitor and want to keep the sun off the screen by closing your curtains, you’re probably operating at the behest of Osama bin Laden.
If you’d rather not let the entire neighborhood know your business then you could be planning to hijack planes and crash them into buildings.
Of course, the sheer lunacy of this commercial on the face of it doesn’t need to be explained in any depth. What’s infinitely more disturbing is the deeper message the government is trying to force upon the public – that everyone has a responsibility to act as a citizen spy, a Stasi informant working for the state, and that everyone is under constant suspicion no matter how apparently benign their behavior.
This has nothing to do with catching non-existent terrorists and everything to do with creating the perception that anyone who attempts to live their life even marginally outside of the system, by not having a credit card for example, is a potential danger to the rest of the sheep who have chosen to remain firmly inside the confines of the pen.
This is about getting the other inmates to police any other prisoner who dares to step outside the boundary of the cell.
Another aspect is the accelerating attempt to create a cashless society where every transaction is tracked and recorded. To predominantly eliminate the use of cash, it has to be demonized as suspicious, dirty and criminal.
People who have been reading this website will know that we have tracked the evolution of these kind of campaigns with increasing horror at their resemblance to the darkest days of Stalinist Russia and Nazi Germany.
Similar previous “anti-terror” campaigns have featured posters that imply people who get refunds, live in apartments, or drive vans should be reported. Does that sound incredible? It’s true, the London Metropolitan Police actually ran a campaign encouraging people to report individuals as potential terrorists because they had a home, under the slogan, “Terrorists need places to live. Are you suspicious of your tenants or neighbors?”
As America and Britain sink deeper into militarized police states, society begins to parallel more and more aspects of Nazi Germany, especially in the context of citizens being turned against each other, which in turn creates a climate of fear and the constraining sense that one is always being watched.
One common misconception about Nazi Germany was that the police state was solely a creation of the authorities and that the citizens were merely victims. On the contrary, Gestapo files show that 80% of all Gestapo investigations were started in response to information provided by denunciations by “ordinary” Germans.
“There were relatively few secret police, and most were just processing the information coming in. I had found a shocking fact. It wasn’t the secret police who were doing this wide-scale surveillance and hiding on every street corner. It was the ordinary German people who were informing on their neighbors,” wrote Robert Gellately of Florida State University.
Click here for the full report
WH Claims Some Critics Are ‘Serving the Goals of al Qaeda’
February 10, 2010 by admin
Filed under News Stories
February 9th, 2010
ABCNews.com
By Jake Tapper
John Brennan — Assistant to the President and Deputy National Security Advisor for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism — responds to critics of the Obama administration’s counterterrorism policies by saying “Politically motivated criticism and unfounded fear-mongering only serve the goals of al-Qaeda.”
Brennan writes that, “Terrorists are not 100-feet tall. Nor do they deserve the abject fear they seek to instill.”
In the oped, titled “‘We need no lectures’: Administration disrupts terrorists’ plots, takes fight to them abroad,” Brennan writes that politics “should never get in the way of national security. But too many in Washington are now misrepresenting the facts to score political points, instead of coming together to keep us safe.”
The administration op-ed is in response to a USA Today editorial entitled “National security team fails to inspire confidence; Officials’ handling of Christmas Day attack looks like amateur hour.”
Brennan provides a detailed defense of the administration’s handling of failed Christmas Day bomber Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab whom, he says, was “thoroughly interrogated and provided important information.”
He suggests that many critics are hypocritical and clueless.
The most important breakthrough in the interrogation occurred “after Abdulmutallab was read his rights, which the FBI made standard policy under Michael Mukasey, President Bush’s attorney general,” he writes, noting that failed shoe bomber Richard Reid “was read his Miranda rights five minutes after being taken off a plane he tried to blow up. The same people who criticize the president today were silent back then.”
Brennan said anyone who wants to change the policy would be casting aside lessons learned “in waging this war” on extremists.
“Terrorists such as Jose Padilla and Saleh al-Mari did not cooperate when transferred to military custody, which can harden one’s determination to resist cooperation,” he writes.
He calls it “naive to think that transferring Abdulmutallab to military custody would have caused an outpouring of information. There is little difference between military and civilian custody, other than an interrogator with a uniform. The suspect gets access to a lawyer, and interrogation rules are nearly identical.”
Moreover, Brennan says, hundreds of terrorists have been convicted in criminal courts while only three have been convicted in the military tribunal system.
The former CIA official also asserts that the Obama administration is doing a better job than the Bush administration did in taking the fight to al Qaeda. “This administration’s efforts have disrupted dozens of terrorist plots against the homeland and been responsible for killing and capturing hundreds of hard-core terrorists, including senior leaders in Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia and beyond — far more than in 2008.”
“We need no lectures about the fact that this nation is at war,” he says.
USA Today’s editorial writers see it all a bit differently, of course, writing that though “the Obama administration’s national security officials have struggled to assure the public that they know exactly what they’re doing,” they are so far “achieving the opposite, and they’re needlessly adding some jitters in the process.”
The editorial writers fault the Obama administration for announcing “last week that an attack by al-Qaeda is likely in the next three to six months. The warning is bound to frighten the public, with no obvious benefit beyond the ability to say ‘I told you so.’”
They also refer to National Intelligence Director Admiral Dennis Blair (ret.) as having “had a ‘Duh!’ moment” for acknowledging that “authorities fumbled the initial questioning of Abdulmutallab by failing to call in the high-value interrogation group, which was created to question terrorism suspects. Refreshingly candid, yes, but not a statement that inspires confidence. Especially when the same day, at another Senate hearing, FBI Director Robert Mueller testified that the high-value unit was still in its ‘formation stages’ and that ‘there was no time’ to get it to Detroit.”
USA Today’s editorial writers say that when senior administration officials revealed Abdulmutallab’s cooperation with authorities, “the news pretty much negate(d) earlier claims that no intelligence was lost when Abdulmutallab was prematurely read his rights.”
Click here for the full report
Turkey To Block 3,700 Websites “For Political Reasons”
January 19, 2010 by admin
Filed under News Stories
January 19, 2010
Reuters.com
Milos Haraszti, media freedom monitor for the 56-nation Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), said Turkey’s Internet law was failing to preserve free expression in the country and should be changed or abolished.
“In its current form, Law 5651, commonly known as the Internet Law of Turkey, not only limits freedom of expression, but severely restricts citizens’ right to access information,” Haraszti said in a statement.
He said Turkey, a European Union candidate, was barring access to 3,700 Internet sites, including YouTube, GeoCities and some Google pages, because Ankara’s Internet law was too broad and subject to political interests.
“Even as some of the content that is deemed ‘bad’, such as child pornography, must be sanctioned, the law is unfit to achieve this. Instead, by blocking access to entire websites from Turkey, it paralyzes access to numerous modern file-sharing or social networks,” Haraszti said.
“Some of the official reasons to block the Internet are arbitrary and political, and therefore incompatible with OSCE’s freedom of expression commitments,” he said. Asked about the OSCE remarks, a Turkish transport and communications ministry official who asked not to be named told Reuters: “Turkey provides unlimited and equal access for all parts of society. It is above the EU average on this issue.
“The regulations over Internet have a dynamic structure and necessary legal changes are made when problems are detected in implementation,” the official added.
Haraszti said Turkish law was still failing to safeguard freedom of expression, and numerous criminal code clauses were being used against journalists, who risked being sent to jail as a result.
Fears for press freedom in Turkey have risen following state attempts to collect a $3.3 billion fine from major media group Dogan in a tax row, part of pressure on Dogan to obey a law limiting foreign ownership of Turkish firms.
In October, the European Commission’s annual report on Turkey’s progress toward EU membership urged Turkey to treat Dogan fairly and said Ankara needed to do more to protect freedom of expression and the press.
Click here for the full report
Police Fight Cellphone Recordings of Illegal Surveillance
January 13, 2010 by admin
Filed under News Stories
January 13, 2010
Boston
By Daniel Rowinski
Simon Glik, a lawyer, was walking down Tremont Street in Boston when he saw three police officers struggling to extract a plastic bag from a teenager’s mouth. Thinking their force seemed excessive for a drug arrest, Glik pulled out his cellphone and began recording.
Within minutes, Glik said, he was in handcuffs.
“One of the officers asked me whether my phone had audio recording capabilities,’’ Glik, 33, said recently of the incident, which took place in October 2007. Glik acknowledged that it did, and then, he said, “my phone was seized, and I was arrested.’’
The charge? Illegal electronic surveillance.
Jon Surmacz, 34, experienced a similar situation. Thinking that Boston police officers were unnecessarily rough while breaking up a holiday party in Brighton he was attending in December 2008, he took out his cellphone and began recording.
Police confronted Surmacz, a webmaster at Boston University. He was arrested and, like Glik, charged with illegal surveillance.
There are no hard statistics for video recording arrests. But the experiences of Surmacz and Glik highlight what civil libertarians call a troubling misuse of the state’s wiretapping law to stifle the kind of street-level oversight that cellphone and video technology make possible.
“The police apparently do not want witnesses to what they do in public,’’ said Sarah Wunsch, a staff attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts, who helped to get the criminal charges against Surmacz dismissed.
Boston police spokeswoman Elaine Driscoll rejected the notion that police are abusing the law to block citizen oversight, saying the department trains officers about the wiretap law. “If an individual is inappropriately interfering with an arrest that could cause harm to an officer or another individual, an officer’s primary responsibility is to ensure the safety of the situation,’’ she said.
In 1968, Massachusetts became a “two-party’’ consent state, one of 12 currently in the country. Two-party consent means that all parties to a conversation must agree to be recorded on a telephone or other audio device; otherwise, the recording of conversation is illegal. The law, intended to protect the privacy rights of individuals, appears to have been triggered by a series of high-profile cases involving private detectives who were recording people without their consent.
In arresting people such as Glik and Surmacz, police are saying that they have not consented to being recorded, that their privacy rights have therefore been violated, and that the citizen action was criminal.
“The statute has been misconstrued by Boston police,’’ said June Jensen, the lawyer who represented Glik and succeeded in getting his charges dismissed. The law, she said, does not prohibit public recording of anyone. “You could go to the Boston Common and snap pictures and record if you want; you can do that.’’
Ever since the police beating of Rodney King in Los Angeles in 1991 was videotaped, and with the advent of media-sharing websites like Facebook and YouTube, the practice of openly recording police activity has become commonplace. But in Massachusetts and other states, the arrests of street videographers, whether they use cellphones or other video technology, offers a dramatic illustration of the collision between new technology and policing practices.
“Police are not used to ceding power, and these tools are forcing them to cede power,’’ said David Ardia, director of the Citizen Media Law Project at Harvard’s Berkman Center for Internet and Society.
Ardia said the proliferation of cellphone and other technology has equipped people to record actions in public. “As a society, we should be asking ourselves whether we want to make that into a criminal activity,’’ he said.
In Pennsylvania, another two-party state, individuals using cellphones to record police activities have also ended up in police custody.
