The Kevin Trudeau Show: 3-9-10
Today, the ‘all-seeing’ Kevin Trudeau explains how the exercises in Washington affect your life directly and gives you the headlines he has been preaching for years:
Despite Costs, More Companies Replace High Fructose Corn Syrup
The Unbelievable Benefits of Omega-3’s
Vitamin D Crucial For Immune System
How to Create a Perpetual Moneymaking Machine
Get Your KT Fix 5 Days a Week!
Plus, Tim Cox, the founder of GOOOH, shakes up the status quo by telling you about a non-partisan plan to evict all 435 politicians from the U.S. House of Representatives. Find out what you can do to help take money out of politics, fire career politicians and break the stranglehold the two parties have on our system! Click here to begin your fight for freedom today!
Take Trudeau on the Go! Click here to download this show to your iPod, mp3 player, or PC through iTunes!
Click below to hear The Kevin Trudeau Show RIGHT NOW!!!
Sugar Gains Favor On Labels
March 8, 2010
Wall Street Journal
By Anjali Coredeiro
High fructose corn syrup, the sugar alternative used to sweeten sodas, cookies, condiments and cereals, is beginning to lose some ground in the packaged-food industry.
More big-name food and beverage products—including Kraft Foods Inc.’s Wheat Thins —have begun dropping the ingredient in favor of sugar, despite a big difference in cost, saying they are responding to consumer preferences for ingredients perceived as more natural.
ConAgra Foods Inc. in May will start replacing the sweetener with sugar in its Hunt’s tomato ketchup. “That’s what consumers are looking for—simpler ingredient listings and ingredients they are familiar with,” ConAgra spokeswoman Teresa Paulsen said. …
Click here for the full report
The Kevin Trudeau Show: 2-24-10
Today, Kevin explains who really controls the mainstream media outlets and gives you detailed proof that they are deceiving the public, especially with his court proceedings. Plus, find out how high fructose corn syrup is like crack cocaine!
Take Trudeau on the Go! Click here to download this show to your iPod, mp3 player, or PC through iTunes!
Click below to hear The Kevin Trudeau Show RIGHT NOW!!!
High Fructose Corn Syrup EXPOSED!
February 23, 2010 by KT
Filed under Kevin's Blog
As I promised on my radio show, here is Personal Trainer Herve Duchemin’s AskMen.com article “Celebrity Workout: Tobey Maguire” and the President of the Corn Refiners Association, Audrae Erickson’s response to thus article:
——————– Corn Refiner’s Letter———————————
Subject: Comment: “Celebrity Workout: Tobey Maguire”
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 17:33:17 -0400
Dear Mr. Duchenmin: We read your AskMen.com article “Celebrity Workout: Tobey Maguire,” with interest, particularly the advice to avoid foods that include high fructose corn syrup. We would like to provide you with science-based information on this safe sweetener and be a reference for you for future articles.
Scientific information, sourced from peer-reviewed journal articles that studied high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) specifically, as well as FDA and the USDA, can be found in the following brochure that provides fully cited answers to frequently asked questions about HFCS http://www.hfcsfacts.com/images/pdf/HFCSBrochure.pdf. Links for many of the studies noted in the brochure can be found at http://www.HFCSfacts.com/Related_Links.html.
HFCS, sugar, honey and several fruit juices all contain the same simple sugars.
Dr. Marion Nestle, Paulette Goddard Professor of Nutrition, Food Studies, and Public Health at New York University and author of “What to Eat” and “Food Politics” told the Spokesman Review “HFCS is glucose and fructose separated. Table sugar is glucose and fructose stuck together, but quickly separated by digestive enzymes. … The body can hardly tell them apart.” (Lamberson C. January 2, 2008. “High-fructose corn syrup may be the next target” Spokesman Review.)
Many studies claim that the body processes HFCS differently than other sugars due to the fructose content. Conclusions from these studies cannot be extrapolated to HFCS. That is because the studies looked at the effects of fructose independently.
Like sugar, honey and some fruit juices, HFCS contains almost equal portions of fructose and glucose. As noted by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 1996, “the saccharide composition (glucose to fructose ratio) of HFCS is approximately the same as that of honey, invert sugar and the disaccharide sucrose (or table sugar).” (61 Fed. Reg. 43447 (August 23, 1996), 21 C.F.R. 184.1866. Direct food substances affirmed as Generally Recognized as Safe; High Fructose Corn Syrup – Final Rule.)
The absence of glucose makes pure fructose fundamentally different from HFCS. This is because glucose has been shown to have a tempering effect on specific metabolic effects of fructose. Once the combination of glucose and fructose found in HFCS and sucrose are absorbed into the blood stream, the two types of sweetener appear to be metabolized similarly using well-characterized metabolic pathways.
A considerable body of published scientific research finds high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) both safe and no different from other common sweeteners like sugar and honey. Recent scientific studies have shown that the human body appears to metabolize HFCS and sugar in much the same way. Like sugar, honey and some fruit juices, HFCS contains almost equal portions of fructose and glucose. Both sugar and HFCS contain 4 calories per gram.
Kathleen J. Melanson, et al. at the University of Rhode Island reviewed the effects of HFCS and sucrose on circulating levels of glucose, leptin, insulin and ghrelin in a study group of lean women. The study found “no differences in the metabolic effects” of HFCS and sucrose. (Melanson KJ, Zukley L, Lowndes J, Nguyen V, Angelopoulos TJ, Rippe JM. 2007. Effects of high-fructose corn syrup and sucrose consumption on circulating glucose, insulin, leptin, and ghrelin and on appetite in normal-weight women. Nutrition 23(2):103-12.)
Joshua Lowndes, et al. reported on the effects of HFCS and sucrose on circulating levels of uric acid. Uric acid is believed to play a role in the development of the metabolic syndrome. This short-term study found “no differences in the metabolic effects in lean women [of HFCS] compared to sucrose,” and also called for further similar studies of obese individuals and males. (Lowndes J, et al. June 2007. The Effect of High-Fructose Corn Syrup on Uric Acid Levels in Normal Weight Women. Presented at the June 2007 meeting of The Endocrine Society. Program Abstract #P2-45.)
Linda M. Zukley, et al. at the Rippe Lifestyle Institute reviewed the effects of HFCS and sucrose on triglycerides in a study group of lean women. This short-term study found “no differences in the metabolic effects in lean women [of HFCS] compared to sucrose,” and called for further similar studies of obese individuals or individuals at risk for the metabolic syndrome. (Zukley M, et al. June 2007. The Effect of High Fructose Corn Syrup on Post-Prandial Lipemia in Normal Weight Females. Presented at the June 2007 meeting of The Endocrine Society. Program Abstract #P2-46.)
No credible research has demonstrated that HFCS affects appetite differently than sugar. Research by Pablo Monsivais, et al. at the University of Washington found that beverages sweetened with sugar and HFCS as well as 1% milk all have similar effects on feelings of fullness. (Monsivais P, Perrigue MM, Drewnowski A. 2007. Sugars and satiety: does the type of sweetener make a difference? Am J Clin Nutr. Jul;86(1):116-23.)
Stijn Soenen and Margriet S Westerterp-Plantenga from the Department of Human Biology at Maastricht University in The Netherlands studied the effects of beverages sweetened with sugar and high fructose corn syrup as well as milk on feelings of fullness. The researchers found “no differences in satiety, compensation or overconsumption” between the three beverages. (Soenen S and Westerterp-Plantenga MS. 2007. No differences in satiety or energy intake after high-fructose corn syrup, sucrose, or milk preloads. Am J Clin Nutr 86:1586 -94.)
Tina Akhavan and G. Harvey Anderson at the Department of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto studied the effect of solutions containing sugar, HFCS and various ratios of glucose to fructose on food intake, average appetite, blood glucose, plasma insulin, ghrelin and uric acid in men. The researchers found that sugar, HFCS, and 1:1 glucose/fructose solutions do not differ significantly in their short-term effects on subjective and physiologic measures of satiety, uric acid and food intake at a subsequent meal. (Akhavan T. and Anderson GH. November 2007. Effects of glucose-to-fructose ratios in solutions on subjective satiety, food intake, and satiety hormones in young men.Am J Clin Nut. Vol. 86(5) 1354-1363.)
Many parts of the world, including Australia, Mexico and Europe, have rising rates of obesity and diabetes despite having little or no HFCS in their foods and beverages, which supports findings by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and the American Diabetes Association that the primary causes of diabetes are obesity, advancing age and heredity.
Around the world, HFCS accounts for about 8 percent of caloric sweeteners consumed. (LMC International, Inc. 2008. Table 2: World Sugar & HFCS Consumption. Sweetener Analysis January 2008.)
USDA data show that per capita consumption of HFCS has been declining in recent years, yet the incidence of obesity and diabetes in the United States remains on the rise.
An expert review of the research literature on the dietary role of HFCS has found insufficient support for the notion that HFCS could play a unique causal role in obesity. The expert panel led by Richard Forshee, Ph.D. of the University of Maryland Center for Food, Nutrition, and Agriculture Policy (CFNAP) concluded that “the currently available evidence is insufficient to implicate HFCS per se as a causal factor in the overweight and obesity problem in the United States.” (Forshee RA, Storey ML, Allison DB, Glinsmann WH, Hein GL, Lineback DR, Miller SA, Nicklas TA, Weaver GA, White JS. 2007. A Critical Examination of the Evidence Relating High Fructose Corn Syrup and Weight Gain. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 47(6):561–582.)
Most sweeteners undergo processing to make the final sweetener. The sugar refining process consists of numerous steps and process aids including: multiple clarifying steps with heat and lime, polymer flocculent and phosphoric acid; multiple evaporation steps; centrifugation; washing with pressure filtration or chemical treatment; and decolorization with carbon or bone char. Hydrochloric acid and sodium hydroxide, or enzymes are added to liquid sucrose to break the bond between glucose and fructose to make invert sugar. Sucrose from sugar beets is processed by similar methods. (See generally Environmental Protection Agency, AP 42, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, Vol. 1, § 9.10.1.1 Sugarcane Processing (5th ed.); Galloway JH. December 1996. History of sugar – Domestication to the 17th Century, abstracted from Annals of the Ass’n of Am. Geographers., Vol. 86, No. 4, at 682-706; Chou CC. 2000. Sugar refining processes and equipment, in Handbook of Sugar Refining: A Manual for the Design and Operation of Sugar Refining Facilities.)
HFCS is made from corn starch, which is separated from other kernel components through multiple grinding and screening steps, centrifugation and washing. The HFCS refining process utilizes multiple enzymes and magnesium and consists of numerous steps including: multiple refining steps using membrane filters, carbon filters and ion-exchange columns; centrifugation; chromatographic separation; and multiple evaporation steps. (See generally White PJ and Johnson LA. 2003. “Corn Sweeteners,” in Corn Chemistry and Technology, 2nd Edition; Alexander RJ. 1998. “Production and Description,” in Sweeteners: Nutritive; and Corn Refiners Association. 2006. “Manufacture,” in Nutritive Sweeteners from Corn, 8th Edition.)
Fruit juice concentrates are purified through heat and enzyme processing and filtered to remove fiber, flavor components and impurities. The end product is almost identical (in calories, sugars and nutrients) to sugar, honey or HFCS. (See generally Nobigrot T, Chasalow FI, Lifshitz F. 1997. Carbohydrate absorption from one serving of fruit juice in young children: age and carbohydrate composition effects. J Am Coll Nutr 16:152-158; Chaplin M, Bucke C. 1990. Enzymes in the fruit juice, wine, brewing and distilling industries, in Enzyme Technology. Cambridge Univ. Press.)
HFCS has a strong history as a safe ingredient recognized by food manufacturers and the U.S. government. In 1983, the Food and Drug Administration listed HFCS as “Generally Recognized as Safe” (known as GRAS status) for use in food, and reaffirmed that ruling in 1996. (61 Fed. Reg. 43447 (August 23, 1996), 21 C.F.R. 184.1866. Direct food substances affirmed as Generally Recognized as Safe; High Fructose Corn Syrup – Final Rule.)
Please do not hesitate to visit our website, www.HFCSfacts.com, for further information or to contact us if we may be of assistance by providing additional information about the products made from corn.
Thank you for your consideration,
Audrae Erickson President
Corn Refiners Association – Washington, DC
———————HERVE’S RESPONSE—————————————
| From: | Herve Duchemin |
| Sent: | Thu 8/14/08 7:57 PM |
| To: | Audrae Erickson |
Ms. Erickson, It is quite the pleasure to hear from you. I wanted to thank you for the information you have provided, and I will look deeper into the research you have provided me with. Nevertheless, my article was geared towards males who want to “lean down”. I will never recommend the consumption of high fructose corn syrup as a means to drop bodyfat (whether the substance is deemed safe or not). If you were looking to lose bodyfat, would you honestly recommend consuming high fructose corn syrup? I think “organic corn” would be a much better choice, don’t you think? I look forward to your response.
Regards,
Herve J. Duchemin
Sodas Linked to Pancreatic Cancer
February 9, 2010
Natural News
By Mike Adams
A 14-year study of 60,000 people in Singapore found that those who consume two or more sweetened soft drinks per week have an 87 percent higher risk of pancreatic cancer.
Published in the journal Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, the study was led by Mark Pereira of the University of Minnesota who said, “The high levels of sugar in soft drinks may be increasing the level of insulin in the body, which we think contributes to pancreatic cancer cell growth.”
Nearly 38,000 people are diagnosed with pancreatic cancer in the United States each year, and over 34,000 die from the disease each year. This research points to what may be the common culprit of all those preventable deaths: Sugary soft drink consumption.
Poison in a can
NaturalNews has warned readers for years about the dangers of consuming soft drinks. The sweetener used in most beverages — high-fructose corn syrup — is linked to both diabetes and obesity. The phosphoric acid found in soft drinks is highly acidic, stripping minerals from bones and promoting osteoporosis. At the same time, soft drinks can cause kidney stones, too.
For those who consume diet sodas, the health risks may be even worse: Aspartame causes neurological side effects that include blindness, headaches and impaired cognitive function.
The beverage industry, of course, denies any links between soda consumption and negative health effects. It wants consumers to naively believe that liquid sugar, phosphoric acid and pressurized carbon dioxide are all good for you!
But experience tells us otherwise: Look at the people you know who consume the most soft drinks and ask yourself this simple question: Are they the healthiest people I know? Probably not.
Most likely, if they’ve been drinking sodas for many years, they’re suffering from obesity, diabetes, kidney stones and perhaps even pancreatic cancer.
Click here for the full report.
The Kevin Trudeau Show: 2-9-10
Today, Kevin explains how the mainstream media is out of touch with the real world and why Big Pharma believes it’s ‘not about a cure, it’s about repeat business.’
Sodas with High Fructose Corn Syrup Cause Cancer Not Sugar
The New Definition of Child Abuse
The Most Evil Corporation
McDonalds Closing Hundreds of Locations in Japan
17,000 Harmful Chemicals Kept Secret Under Obscure Law
Chemicals Passed Through Breast Milk May Cause Cancer
Plus, Sharry Edwards, the creator of Human BioAcoustic Vocal Profiling Techniques & Technologies, gives you the inside story behind what your voice can really say about you and your health. Click here for your free personality vocal reading and click here for your free nutritional reading or call them at (740) 698-9119. Remember to mention Kevin Trudeau to get each report FREE!
Take Trudeau on the Go! Click here to download this show to your iPod, mp3 player, or PC through iTunes!
Click HERE to listen to The Kevin Trudeau Show RIGHT NOW!!!
Processed Soy Products Are Bad for You
January 06, 2010
Naural News
By Mike Adams
One of the strangest behaviors I’ve ever seen in the natural health crowd is something I call “Soy Rage.” It’s an angry reaction that wells up in some people every time they hear me recommend natural, non-GMO, home-made soy milk.
People get angry about it. Downright nasty at times. They insist all soy is bad for you and there’s no such thing as “healthy soy.” To that, I say stop blaming the plant.
Blame the processing. (And the slash-and-burn farming…)
Processed soy is atrociously bad for you
Based on everything I’ve learned over the last decades or soy, I believe that processed soy products are atrociously bad for you. I wouldn’t touch a carton of Silk with a ten-foot straw. Processed tofu is a nutritious joke, and when it comes to soy protein, I’ve already published numerous articles exposing the toxins found in conventional processed soy protein.
Processed soy, like lots of processed things, is quite bad for your health.
But natural soy, grown organically (and locally, where possible), can actually be quite good for you. Natural soy milk, made right at home, has been part of the healthy traditional Chinese diet for thousands of years. Some of its plant-based nutrients have very powerful anti-cancer elements that can help prevent both prostate and breast cancers. Natural, non-GMO soy has some very positive properties and can play an important role in a healthy disease-preventing diet.
But the Soy Rage people don’t see it that way. To them, all soy is bad for you, end of discussion.
It’s an ignorant belief. It’s like saying “all sugar is bad for you.”
Well, not really. When I take a machete and cut some living sugar cane stalks here in Ecuador, and I take them to a sugar cane juicing machine and squeeze out all the green juice, with all its minerals and phytonutrients, and then I enjoy that amazing beverage, it’s very good for me! Drinking raw sugar cane juice is a lot like drinking wheat grass juice (sugar cane is actually a grass) except it tastes way better.
Sugar is a lot like soy: When it’s unprocessed and natural, it’s quite good for you. When it’s processed and modified, it’s bad!
Lots of things are good for you BEFORE they’re processed
Many people in the natural health arena need a better understanding of this: There are lots of things that are quite good for you in their unprocessed form. It’s the processing that makes them bad for you.
For example:
Processed sugar cane is bad. Raw sugar cane is good.
Processed salt is bad. Unprocessed, full-spectrum sea salt is good.
Processed cow’s milk is bad. Fresh, raw cow’s milk is good.
Processed chocolate can be a junk food. Raw, natural cacao is a superfood!
Processed wheat is bad for you. Stone-ground whole wheat can be good for you.
Processed soy milk is bad. Natural, home-made soy milk is good.
Processed cheese is bad. Natural, home-made cheese is far less so.
Processed (canned) fruits are bad. Raw, fresh fruits are good for you.
You see, it’s not the food itself that’s good or bad — it’s the processing! And sadly, virtually all the foods consumed by most consumers today are highly processed.
What happens when you “process” food
So what’s the problem with processing food anyway? When you process food, five very bad things happen:
#1 – Minerals are stripped out, such as 98% of the magnesium being stripped out of wheat when it’s milled and bleached into white flour.
#2 – Phytonutrients are destroyed. As much as 90% of the phytonutrient content is lost during processing. (And remember, phytonutrients are the disease-fighting medicines found in foods.)
#3 – The physical properties of foods are artificially altered in a way that makes them dangerous. The homogenization of milk, for example, alters the fat molecules in milk, giving them properties that contribute to heart disease and clogged arteries. Partially-hydrogenated oils are also the result of a physical alteration that makes food dangerous for your health.
Children’s Network Nickelodeon Run Ads Promoting Junk Food
December 14, 2009
Natural News
By Paul Louis
The Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) determined that “nearly 80 percent of food ads on the popular children’s network Nickelodeon are for foods of poor nutritional quality.” This modest improvement from 90 percent in 2005 was considered insufficient, and the industry’s self regulatory group was chastised for such a small improvement over a four year span.
CSPI nutrition policy director Margo G. Wootan stated, “It’s a modest start, but not sufficient to address children’s poor eating habits and the sky-high rates of childhood obesity.”
The food industry’s self regulatory system was formed under the moniker of The Children’s Food and Beverage Advertising Initiative (CFBAI) after the initial 2005 CSPI report. It was formed under the Better Business Bureau. Evidently, self regulation within a group of many members vying for big bucks is not such a great idea.
CSPI took a close look at all the food manufacturers who are members of CFBAI and discovered that 60 percent of their advertised foods did not measure up to CSPI nutritional standards. If 80 percent of Nickelodeon ads were promoting foods of poor nutritional quality, that means the foods with the poorest nutritional quality were advertised more than CSPI’s acceptable foods.
Apparently CSPI standards are not even that high. The major concern of obesity from sugar and fats ignores all the other trappings of junk food, such as high fructose corn syrup, a terrible health-destroying sweetener often used because it’s cheaper than sugar. Another less expensive sweetener that seems to be ignored is aspartame, a neurotoxin with serious health consequences.
Then there is MSG with its myriad disguises. MSG as a flavor enhancer is also a neurotoxin, and its addictive quality makes it a usual suspect in obesity issues. The fact that corn-based sweeteners are probably sourced from GMO corn seems to be ignored. Bottom line: The percentage of health-destroying junk foods that the CFBAI companies offer is very likely much higher than 60 percent.
Among the nutritionally uneducated, the sole urge to avoid obesity encourages using dangerous sweeteners while avoiding healthy fats. It’s a recipe for worsening health. And it appears that mainstream dietary standards are lacking the complete picture. So it’s up to parents to be well informed about nutritional issues and take control of their children’s diets.
Click here for the full report.
My Q&A with Mancow
October 26, 2009 by KT
Filed under Kevin's Blog
You requested it so here it is! Controversial Talk Show host, Erich “Mancow” Muller was on my show asking some of the same health questions you may be having…..
Health Q&A session
Mancow: Is a glass of red wine every night a good thing?
Kevin: Yes!
M: I worked at a pool store and noticed that none of the owners would swim in pools but they would swim in lakes. Why is chlorine bad for you?
K: Ok, just have a sip and tell me. Seriously, it’s got skull and bones all over the chlorine. It kills! Have a glass of chlorine and then ask me again.
M: If you and I went out to eat and I ordered oysters, you wouldn’t eat any. Why?
K: Shellfish absorb all the toxins in the water. More people are allergic to shellfish, more people get sick from shellfish, and more people die from shellfish than any other food in the planet. It’s very toxic.
M: I have some oxygen drops and I put 8 in my water everyday. Is this a scam or is this the real deal?
K: Some products are better then others. I recommend 35% Food Grade Hydrogen Peroxide. You put that in water and drink it and it helps oxygenate.
M: Because cancer can’t live in an oxygen rich environment. Is that the idea?
K: Cancer and viruses can not live in an oxygen rich environment. Right now, with all the flus going around and sickness which is caused by vitamin and mineral deficiency, the oxygen is very helpful.
M: Is sugar food for cancer?
K: Yes, but not sugar from fruit. If you eat an orange you are eating ‘a lot of sugar’. If you eat corn on the cob, provided its not genetically mortified corn, you’re also getting a lot of sugar. Cane sugar is fine. You and I can go up to Chicago to the Vietnamese area and have cane juice, where they take sugar cane and put it in what looks like a wood chipper and drink that. That’s not going to feed cancer. What does feed cancer is the crack cocaine of sugar, which is white sugar. That’s the crack cocaine of sugar but raw, evaporated cane juice is perfectly fine. High fructose corn syrup also feeds cancer. [One Minute Cure]
M: You’ve lost weight. Are you using pregnant lady urine?
K: No, that’s a misnomer. Dr. Simeons in 1959 discovered this and found that people that are obese have a very high appetite; very intense, physical appetite. They have low metabolism and they store fat abnormally. They also have food cravings. That’s caused by a hypothalamus gland that operates abnormally. The cure, I describe in my book, The Weight Loss Cure “They” Don’t Want You to Know About, millions of people have used this and even the Federal Trade Commission can’t deny it. This is the fastest way to lose fat. Period. There’s nothing faster. You can lose 1 pound per day, which some people lose up to 10 pounds in the first 24 hrs! It’s a compound called HCG, which is the hormone that pregnant women produce.
M: So, how do I find this Kevin?
K: There are clinics everywhere. You go to a medical doctor and he’ll write you a prescription. You can do the injection right at home.
M: Kevin, it’s not possible for a human being to lose 10 pounds in 24 hrs.
K: Hundreds and thousands of people, since 1959, in medical, supervised, clinical studies lose a pound a day. Period.
M: But you said 10 pounds in 24 hours.
K: Up to 10 pounds in the first 24 hours.
M: Why do you have a bean on the back of your phone? What was that?
K: Cell phones cause radiation and categorically 100% will give you brain tumors. So, if you have a cell phone, even if your not talking on it and it is turned on, you’re zapping your body with radiation. If you’re on your cell phone and you notice your ear getting hot, that means you’re microwaving your brain from the inside!
M: It’s happening to me now and I’m not kidding!
K: Seriously, you are microwaving your brain. Remember Johnnie Cochran? He had a phone glued to his ear and he died of a brain tumor. I’ve got friends at the Mayo Clinic and they tell me, secretly, that the number of brain tumors is up ten thousand percent. When the researchers are looking at them, they’re on the side of the head where the cell phone is used the most and they’re in various shapes, which mimic the shape of the antenna in the cell phone.
M: I’ve heard that as well. Listen I’m a big believer in fish oil. I’m I on the right path?
K: It depends on the brand. You can’t go to CVS or Walgreen’s and get off the shelf Omega 3 fish oils. They’re rancid and are no good. There are only a few brands out there and they are very very helpful in lowering blood pressure, reducing cholesterol, reducing chances of heart attacks and even reducing depression. So, they are excellent.
M: Kevin, we were at this big event, and people were coming up and shaking your hand and my mom offered us this hand sanitizer. I use it, everybody else used it, but you didn’t. What’s your problem with hand sanitizer? Isn’t it good to make your hands clean?
K: No, it’s a poison! Look at the ingredients. You’ve got propyleenglycol, which comes from petroleum and it’s a poison that kills bacteria. There’s nothing wrong with having bacteria. It’s good for your body. It’s natural. Bacteria and viruses in the environment are natural. Your body is designed to interact with natural bacteria and natural viruses. Your body responds to it. It’s the natural flow, but when you start putting poisons and toxins on your skin, which are then absorbed in your skin, it shuts down your natural ability to fight off illness and disease. It suppresses your immune system and gives you another toxin in your body which causes disease!
M: I read an article talking about beating the swine flu and I’ve been doing about 5,000 IU’s of vitamin D a day because I can’t drink milk. Is that a good thing? Am I taking too much? Not enough?
K: Vitamin D is good. There are some brands that are better then others, but most vitamin D are in the range of being pretty darn good. Vitamin D3 is excellent and absolutely 100% is one of the key elements in preventing flus, colds and viruses.
M: And green tea. Are you a believer in green tea? My wife is a big green tea person.
K: Green tea is excellent, but here’s the real key; you really don’t need to be taking something every single day. I mean vitamins you do, but something like a green tea I drink it on occasion, but it’s not like “oh, I have to have my green tea today!”
M: I have a doctor tell me one time, ‘A glass of water is just as good in the morning as a cup of coffee,” and to me that’s B.S. Coffee wakes me up. You drink coffee, Kevin. I’ve seen you drink you coffee. Is it bad?
K: No. It’s got caffeine. A little bit of caffeine is perfectly fine. The key with coffee is that you want to use filtered water, organic coffee beans so that you don’t get the toxins and that you don’t drink a gallon a day because the access caffeine will shut down the adrenals and give you adrenal fatigue.
M: My father lead the fight in America against fluoride. He felt it was poison. Let me tell you something, my brothers and I never used fluoride and we have had so many dental problems. To some extent I curse my father because I’ve had so much dental work done due to the fact that we never had fluoride. He forbid it.
K: So, you’re saying that you didn’t have fluoride therefore that must be the cause of your dental problems?
M: I’m saying that every kid in my neighborhood that got water and got the fluoride treatments at the dentist didn’t get a cavity. Now come on, Kevin!
K: Hold on. Now there’s a difference between drinking water with fluoride and putting fluoride on the teeth. There’s a huge difference.
M: But isn’t that the way they sold fluoride to us? That it was fluoride in the water that would help our teeth and our bones?
K: Well, the way they sold it to us was originally fluoride was painted on the teeth. You got a fluoride treatment when you went into the dentist and you got fluoride put on the teeth. Then they put fluoride in toothpaste, but fluoride is a by-product of a superphosphate fertilizer and it’s so toxic. Do you know it’s at the same level as nuclear toxic waste? So, the producers of superphosphate fertilizer had nuclear, toxic waste they couldn’t get rid of. They lobbied the government and convinced the government to dump it in the water supply. That’s why it’s in the water. Painted on teeth is good for teeth but not drinking it. Big difference! [Ewater Filter]
M: You told me that you don’t have a microwave. You make that beautiful wife of yours warm everything up in what a traditional oven? You really don’t have a microwave? I can’t imagine living without a microwave.
K: I would never in a million years use a microwave oven. Not even to boil water. Don’t use it. It changes the whole molecular structure of the food. There was a study that was conducted and it was buried, but we have all the original documents. The U.S Army took two battle battalions; one that was given conventionally heated foods for 30 days, breakfast, lunch, and dinner. All the food was prepared in on the field conventional heating units. The other group in the field used produced microwave units. They wanted to see how it was going to affect the ease of cooking and preparation of meals in a battlefield environment. They stopped after 10 days because the group that was eating 3 meals a day out of the microwave were all too sick. So, go eat 3 microwaved meals a day for a week and let me know how you feel. You’ll be violently ill. Your immune system is magically suppressed. And researchers have taken blood and it shows that the white and red blood cell counts dramatically crash. Also, the liver goes into toxic shock! It looks like you’re dying.
M: Why is infertility in America at record levels?
K: In America, we have the highest rate of infertility than ever before and it is not one thing, it’s a combination of things. This includes; microwave food, high fructose corn syrup, genetically modified food, the 22 pharmaceutical drugs found in the water, the chlorine in the water, fluoride in the water, the stress from laptop computers and all these other electronic devices, nutritional deficiency, and mineral deficiency. People forget today that the food that we’re eating, even if it’s organic, comes from same soil, which has no minerals anymore. The food in America has vertically no minerals in it and mineral deficiencies are the base nutritional deficiency for every disease. You take an apple, a carrot, of a piece of celery or a piece of lettuce grown in European soil, it has up to 10 times more nutritional content and mineral content than that in America! [Mercola Supplements]
I hope you enjoyed this Q&A with my friend, Mancow. Stay tuned to the show every week and you’ll hear me discuss all of the above much more in-depth!
-KT
The Kevin Trudeau Show: 10-13-09
Today, Kevin explains the consequences of what would happen if the government ran America’s healthcare system and what they’re REALLY spending your hard earned money on!!
Weight Gain
Illegal Immigration
Aspartame Warning
Infertility
Make Money Now
Soy is Poison
Plus, radio host and filmmaker, Alex Jones, joined Kevin to expose the truth about government corruption, mandatory vaccinations, and his new documentary, “Fall of The Republic: The Presidency of Barack H. Obama.”
Take Trudeau on the Go! Click here to download this show to your iPod, mp3 player, or PC through iTunes!
Click below to hear The Kevin Trudeau Show RIGHT NOW!!!
