The Kevin Trudeau Show: 7-14-12
Today, Kevin explains why the government doesn’t want you to know about certain technologies that are currently being produced and how the end of organic products in America is near. Plus, find out how to eliminate herpes, HPV, and other viruses that are lurking within your body when Dr. Ray Lala calls in from New Zealand!
Self Help:
Push The Viruses OUT!
The Secret To Perfect Health
Untainted Meat & Dairy
Get Vitamin D3 Free For Life!
Eliminate Depression Symptoms
Tap Your Way To Happiness
Test Your PH
Emergency Preparedness
Travel Water Filter
Health:
Grandma’s Home Remedies
Plants Can Think and Remember
New Lawsuit Filed over GMO Alfalfa
Apple Founder Steve Jobs Has 6 Weeks to Live?
Wealth:
The Billionaire’s Guide To Not Paying Taxes
The 10 Most Counterfeited Products Sold in America
Technology:
Teen Builds Backyard Death Ray
Unbelievable:
Rutgers University Pays Snooki 32K To Speak
Everything Kevin:
Become An Insider!
Support Kevin!
Kevin is on YouTube!
Sign Up For Kevin’s FREE Podcast
Follow Kevin on Twitter
Become A Fan of Kevin on Facebook
Kevin’s Film Club
Kevin’s Book Club
Take Trudeau on the Go! Click here to download this show to your iPod, mp3 player, or PC through iTunes!
Click below to watch the Kevin Trudeau Show!

The Kevin Trudeau Show: 4-23-11
Today, Kevin explains why the government doesn’t want you to know about certain technologies that are currently being produced and how the end of organic products in America is near. Plus, find out how to eliminate herpes, HPV, and other viruses that are lurking within your body when Dr. Ray Lala calls in from New Zealand!
Self Help:
Push The Viruses OUT!
The Secret To Perfect Health
Untainted Meat & Dairy
Get Vitamin D3 Free For Life!
Eliminate Depression Symptoms
Tap Your Way To Happiness
Test Your PH
Emergency Preparedness
Travel Water Filter
Health:
Grandma’s Home Remedies
Plants Can Think and Remember
New Lawsuit Filed over GMO Alfalfa
Apple Founder Steve Jobs Has 6 Weeks to Live?
Wealth:
The Billionaire’s Guide To Not Paying Taxes
The 10 Most Counterfeited Products Sold in America
Technology:
Teen Builds Backyard Death Ray
Unbelievable:
Rutgers University Pays Snooki 32K To Speak
Everything Kevin:
Become An Insider!
Support Kevin!
Kevin is on YouTube!
Sign Up For Kevin’s FREE Podcast
Follow Kevin on Twitter
Become A Fan of Kevin on Facebook
Kevin’s Film Club
Kevin’s Book Club
Take Trudeau on the Go! Click here to download this show to your iPod, mp3 player, or PC through iTunes!
Click below to watch the Kevin Trudeau Show!

The Kevin Trudeau Show: 4-9-11
Today, the “all-seeing” Kevin Trudeau gives you his predictions for what will happen to the US economy & the US dollar within the next 2-5 years. Plus, Dr. Tom Morter stops by to explain why Trace Minerals are absolutely imperative to your health and why you should never leave home without it!
Self Help:
Survive And Prosper!
Your Wish Is YOUR Command
Emergency Preparedness
Don’t Leave Home Without It
Nature’s Best Antibiotic
Everything Kevin:
Become An Insider!
Support Kevin!
Kevin is on YouTube!
Sign Up For Kevin’s FREE Podcast
Follow Kevin on Twitter
Become A Fan of Kevin on Facebook
Take Trudeau on the Go! Click here to download this show to your iPod, mp3 player, or PC through iTunes!
Click below to watch the Kevin Trudeau Show!

Obama Losing Whites?
July 23, 2010 by admin
Filed under News Stories
July 23, 2010
WorldNetDaily
By: Pat Buchanan
On Monday, the Department of Agriculture demanded the resignation of Shirley Sherrod over a two-minute videotape where she appeared to describe to a cheering crowd of the Georgia NAACP how she denied assistance to a poor white farmer about to lose his land.
Declaring itself “appalled” at this “shameful” act of racism, the NAACP said it would investigate the Georgia crowd that cheered her and praised the Department of Agriculture for firing her.
On Wednesday, Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack was begging for Sherrod’s forgiveness, and the NAACP was burbling apologies.
For the video turned out to be an excerpt from a speech in which Sherrod described her growth from a bitter black woman whose father was murdered by a white man into one who found joy helping poor white folks keep their farms.
What was it that caused the rush to judgment by Vilsack, the NAACP and a White House that supported the ouster of Sherrod without talking to her or viewing the full tape?
Panic. The White House fears it is losing white America because of a false perception that it harbors a bias against white America.
Outrageous, rail those journalists who celebrated the NAACP’s accusation that the tea party is harboring racists and is too cowardly to confront them.
Yet, as things perceived as real are real in their consequences, if the White House does not eradicate this perception, its lease may not be renewed. Whence comes that perception? Several incidents.
First was the startling accusation by Attorney General Eric Holder, days after Barack Obama was inaugurated in a gusher of good feeling, that we are all “a nation of cowards” when it comes to facing issues of race.
A real icebreaker for a national conversation.
Second was the instantaneous verdict of the president, when asked about the arrest of Harvard’s Henry Louis Gates by Cambridge cop Sgt. James Crowley. With no knowledge of what happened, Obama blurted out that the cops had “acted stupidly.”
It took a White House beer summit to detoxify that one.
A third was the revelation that Obama’s first Supreme Court nominee, Judge Sonia Sotomayor, the “wise Latina” herself, had gone to extremes to see that the case of Frank Ricci and the New Haven, Conn., firefighters never got to the Supreme Court. Ricci and co-defendants had been denied promotions they had won in competitive exams solely because they were white and no black firemen had done as well.
The fourth was the Justice Department’s dropping of charges against members of the New Black Panther Party, whose intimidation of voters in Philadelphia had been captured on tape.
When a department official resigned in protest and went to the Civil Rights Commission to accuse officials at Justice of ordering staff attorneys not to pursue such cases, that explosive charge, too, was ignored by Justice.
Came then the NAACP smear that the tea party was harboring racists, which Joe Biden explicitly rejected on national television on Sunday, before the Monday firestorm over Sherrod.
Now, whatever one’s views on each of these episodes in which race played a role, white Americans are being forced to address them. And, surely, the White House understands this is bad news for Obama and the Democratic Party.
For though the black community remains solidly behind Obama and the white majority is shrinking toward minority status by 2042 or 2050, depending on which Census survey one uses, whites in America still outnumber blacks five to one. And if forced constantly to come down on one side or the other of a racial divide, most folks will wind up with their own.
In past elections, Democrats have raised race – allegations that black churches were being torched in the South, that George W. Bush’s opposition to a hate-crimes bill meant he was coldly indifferent to the dragging death of a handicapped black man – to solidify and energize the minority vote. And, today, that vote remains solid behind Obama.
Where the erosion is taking place is in white America, among working- and middle-class folks who voted for Hillary Clinton in the primaries but took a chance with Obama in the fall. Now, every time some new incident erupts, these folks are being tarred.
Opposition to affirmative action is racist. Supporting the tea party gives aid and comfort to racists. Opposing health care puts you in league with folks who used racial slurs on Rep. John Lewis. To raise the issue of the New Black Panther Party is to play the race card.
One understands the bitterness of tea-party folks who carry signs that read: “What difference does it make what this placard says? You’ll call it racist anyway.”
As the National Journal’s Ron Brownstein has been reporting, white America is increasingly alienated and distrustful of all our major economic and political power centers – the banks, big corporations, the government.
And, for the first time in our lifetimes outside the South, white racial consciousness has visibly begun to rise.
Click Here For The Full Article
Worrying Could Actually Be Good For You
April 5, 2010 by admin
Filed under News Stories
April 5, 2010
Telegraph.co.uk
By Richard Alleyne
Scientists studying the mental condition found that anxious apprehension or worry negates the ill effects of the disease.
This was in direct contrast to a different type of anxiety called anxious arousal which is characterised by fear and panic.
Scientists made the discovery by monitoring activity in the brain when people were experiencing one of the two types of anxiety while also depressed.
The results suggest that fearful vigilance sometimes heightens the brain activity associated with depression, whereas worry may actually counter it, thus reducing some of the negative effects of depression and fear.
Professor Gregory Miller, a psychologist at the University of Illinois, said: “It could be that having a particular type of anxiety will help processing in one part of the brain while at the same time hurting processing in another part of the brain.
“Sometimes worry is a good thing to do. Maybe it will get you to plan better. Maybe it will help you to focus better. There could be an upside to these things.
“Although we think of depression and anxiety as separate things, they often co-occur.
“In a national study of the prevalence of psychiatric disorders, three-quarters of those diagnosed with major depression had at least one other diagnosis.
“In many cases, those with depression also had anxiety, and vice versa.”
An earlier brain scan study found that the two types of anxiety produce very different patterns of activity in the brain. Anxious arousal lights up a region of the right inferior temporal lobe – just behind the ear.
Worry, on the other hand, activates a region in the left frontal lobe that is linked to speech production.
Brain scans were done on people performing a task that involved naming the colours of words that had negative, positive, or neutral meanings.
This allowed the researchers to observe which brain regions were activated in response to emotional words.
The researchers found that the functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) signature of the brain of a worried and depressed person doing the emotional word task was very different from that of a vigilant or panicky depressed person.
Click here for the full report.
Senator Durbin Blasts DC for Shutting Down for Snow
February 15, 2010 by admin
Filed under News Stories
February 15, 2010
The Hill
By Jordy Jager
Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) blasted Washingtonians for going “into a full-scale panic” during snowstorms, unlike people from Illinois who “know how to live with it.”
“I first came here as a student in 1963 … I lived a big part of my life, at least part-time, in Washington, D.C.,” Durbin said in remarks delivered on the Senate floor on Thursday. “I never could get over how people in this town reacted to snow.
“I am convinced that infants born in Washington, D.C., are taken from the arms of their loving mothers right when they are born into a room where someone shows a film of a snowstorm with shrieking and screaming so that those children come to believe snow is a mortal enemy, like a nuclear attack, because I have seen, for over 40 years here, people in this town go into a full-scale panic at the thought of a snowfall.
“We joke about it. Those of us from parts of the country that get snow and know how to live with it cannot get over how crazy the reaction is many times.”
Durbin, however, acknowledged that this past week’s worth of snowfall — which, with more than 55 inches, broke D.C.’s record — was due cause for D.C.-area residents to be concerned.
“But in fairness, this has been a heck of a snowstorm … You had every right to be concerned. Some of the other [storms], maybe not, but this one was the real deal.”
Click here for the full report
Ukraine Swine-Flu Panic: Crisis or Political Ploy?
November 6, 2009 by admin
Filed under News Stories
November 06, 2009
Time
By James Marson
Ukraine is in the midst of what some might call swine-flu hysteria. The country is in virtual lockdown mode, with the government closing schools, universities and movie theaters and banning all public gatherings until the end of November. Pharmacies have run out of protective masks; those who missed the rush are improvising with scarves or homemade facsimiles. And rumors are running rampant, much as they did during Soviet times when the authorities tried to cover up disasters like the Chernobyl nuclear-plant meltdown. “We are worried that the swine flu has mutated and is killing scores of people,” says Nina Sokolovska as she stands in line at a pharmacy.
Given the persistent rumors and the country’s volatile political situation, however, some Ukrainians have suggested that the gravity of the situation is being exaggerated by Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko for political gain ahead of the January presidential elections. “What has happened is hysteria and panic, which is being provoked,” says Arseniy Yatsenyuk, a presidential candidate currently running third in the polls. He accused Tymoshenko of whipping up a frenzy to distract people from the government’s failings. “Is anyone talking about wages? No. Is anyone talking about the 4 million unemployed? No. Is anyone talking about the gas we haven’t paid for? No,” he says. The media have also questioned Tymoshenko’s motives. A headline on one Ukrainian news website, Ukrayinska Pravda, read: “Who needs swine flu and who needs a high rating?”
Others are taking the flu pandemic more seriously and are blaming Tymoshenko for mishandling the government’s response efforts. Viktor Yanukovych, the leader of the opposition and front-runner in the presidential race, has called for the Health Minister to be fired and accused Tymoshenko of putting people’s health at risk by launching her own presidential campaign with a rally just six days before the ban on public gatherings was announced. “Tymoshenko knew she shouldn’t bring such a large number of people to Kiev. It was a feast at the time of a plague,” he says. Current President Viktor Yushchenko — Tymoshenko’s former partner in the 2004 Orange Revolution and now her bitter rival — also attacked her for holding a campaign rally, saying it was “criminal irresponsibility” if it allowed the disease to spread.
But Tymoshenko has also been praised by many for implementing sweeping measures to try to stop the spread of flu. She has made every effort to appear on top of the situation, personally going to meet a shipment of the H1N1 vaccine Tamiflu at Kiev’s airport on Monday. One doctor who asked not to be named in the hard-hit Lviv region praised the Prime Minister’s actions. “Politicians are aggravating the situation by making so much noise,” she tells TIME. In addition, Glenn Thomas, a spokesman for the WHO team that’s been dispatched to Kiev to assist Ukrainian authorities, says the government’s response had been “transparent and rapid.”
Taras Berezovets, an adviser to Tymoshenko, tells TIME that Yushchenko and the other presidential candidates are using the swine-flu epidemic as an opportunity to attack the Prime Minister. “The media are to blame for the panic. From the beginning, the government has told people to remain calm and follow some simple rules,” he says.
Tymoshenko has been guilty of one thing: sending mixed messages. The closing of schools and banning of public gatherings are among the harshest measures in Europe against the H1N1 virus. Yet Tymoshenko has not forcefully advocated for people to get vaccinated against the virus. “I am not vaccinated,” she said in a television address this week. “I am protecting myself like everybody, with lemon, onion, garlic, everything that is needed. I think the best way is simply to protect your health through well-known means.” Yushchenko, meanwhile, has urged people to get vaccinated immediately.
Unemployment rate at 9.8%
October 2, 2009 by admin
Filed under News Stories
October 2, 2009
Yahoo Finance
By Christopher Rugaber
The U.S. unemployment rate rose to 9.8 percent in September, the highest since June 1983, as employers cut far more jobs than expected.
The report shows that the worst recession since the 1930s is still inflicting widespread pain and underscores one of the biggest threats to the nascent economic recovery: that consumers, worried about job losses and stagnant wages, will restrain spending. Consumer spending accounts for about 70 percent of America’s economy.
Most analysts expect the economy to continue to improve, but at a slow, uneven pace. Government stimulus efforts, such as the Cash for Clunkers auto rebates, likely boosted the economy in the July-September quarter, but economists worry that growth will slow once the impact of such programs fades.
“Consumers … are going to struggle to increase their income,” said Brian Fabbri, North American chief economist for BNP Paribas. “If they’re struggling, they’re not consuming. That just takes some of the legs out of recovery.”
The Labor Department said Friday that the U.S. economy lost a net total of 263,000 jobs last month, from a downwardly revised 201,000 in August. That’s worse than Wall Street economists’ expectations of 180,000 job losses, according to a survey by Thomson Reuters.
The unemployment rate rose from 9.7 percent in August, matching expectations.
If laid-off workers who have settled for part-time work or have given up looking for new jobs are included, the unemployment rate rose to 17 percent, the highest on records dating from 1994.
All told, 15.1 million Americans are now out of work, the department said. And 7.2 million jobs have been eliminated since the recession began in December 2007.
The department said 571,000 of the unemployed dropped out of the work force last month, presumably out of frustration over the lack of jobs. That sent the participation rate, or the percentage of the population either working or looking for work, to a 23-year low.
The unemployment rate would have topped 10 percent if the labor force hadn’t shrank, Fabbri said.
Older, laid-off workers are dropping out and requesting Social Security at a faster-than-expected pace, according to government officials. The Social Security Administration said earlier this week that applications for retirement benefits are 23 percent higher than last year, while disability claims have risen by about 20 percent.
Meanwhile, the number of people out of work for six months or longer jumped to a record 5.4 million, and they now make up almost 36 percent of the unemployed — also a record.
Persistent joblessness could pose political problems for President Barack Obama, who pushed through an ambitious $787 billion stimulus package in February intended to “save or create” 3.5 million jobs by the end of 2010.
“We still think the overall trend is moving in the right direction,” said Christina Romer, chair of the President’s Council of Economic Advisers. “We’re going from much larger job losses earlier this year. They are moderating. We want them to moderate more.”
Republicans note that job losses have continued despite the stimulus. “Wasteful government spending is not the solution to what ails this economy,” said Indiana Rep. Mike Pence, chairman of the House Republican caucus.
Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said Thursday that even if the economy were to grow at a 3 percent pace in the coming quarters, it would not be enough to quickly drive down the unemployment rate. Bernanke said the rate is likely to remain above 9 percent through the end of 2010.
Besides the sagging jobs market, other potential obstacles to a smooth recovery include wary consumers, the troubled commercial real estate market, and a tight lending environment for individuals and businesses, said Eric Rosengren, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
“These challenges will likely make the recovery rather restrained by historical standards, with subdued levels of spending and lending continuing to hold back a more rapid recovery,” Rosengren said in a speech in Boston on Friday.
Against that backdrop, key monetary and fiscal policy supports will need to be keep in place to help foster a recovery, Rosengren said.
Hourly earnings rose by a penny last month, while weekly wages fell $1.54 to $616.11, according to the government data.
The average hourly work week fell back to a record low of 33 in September. That figure is important because economists are looking for companies to add more hours for current workers before they hire new ones.
The uncertainty that surrounds the recovery has made employers reluctant to hire. The Business Roundtable, a group of CEOs from large corporations, said earlier this week that only 13 percent of its members expect to increase hiring over the next six months.
While job losses have slowed since the first quarter of this year when they averaged 691,000 a month, the cuts actually worsened last month in many sectors compared with August.
Construction jobs fell by 64,000, more than the 60,000 eliminated in August. And service sector companies cut 147,000 jobs, more than double the 69,000 in the previous month. Retailers lost 38,500 jobs, compared to less than 9,000 in August.
Government jobs fell 53,000, the report said, with local governments cutting the most.
One the bright side, temporary help agencies eliminated only 1,700 jobs, down from the previous month. Economists see temporary jobs as a leading indicator, as employers are likely to hire temp workers before permanent ones.
Tig Gilliam, CEO of Adecco North America, a temporary job agency, said the industry likely will add jobs next month.
According to a separate report Friday, U.S. factory orders fell in August by the largest amount in five months.
The Commerce Department said demand for manufactured goods dropped 0.8 percent, much worse than the 0.7 percent gain that economists had expected. The August decline reflected plunging demand for commercial aircraft, a category that surged in July.
Click here for the full report
H1N1 Swine Flu Scenarios: Best Case, Worst Case Predictions
August 13, 2009 by admin
Filed under News Stories
August 13, 2009
Natural News
By Mike Adams
When it comes to swine flu, the public predictions are all over the map: On one hand, governments don’t want you to be so worried that you start to panic and stay home from work, but they want you to be worried enough to submit to a vaccine injection.
Beyond the vaccine propaganda and the WHO’s agenda to prop up the profits of drug companies by seizing control of the intellectual property of influenza viruses, what’s really likely to happen this year as the virus spreads?
Here, I present some educated guesses on the best case / worst case scenarios we may see unfold with the H1N1 swine flu pandemic.
Best Case, Worst Case for your kids in public schools
Best Case: A few sneezers at school get isolated or masks are slapped on their faces. Infections are mild and deaths are few.
Worst Case: Mutating strains of the swine flu storm like a wildfire through the public school system, infecting tens of millions of children, killing tens of thousands, and shuttering the school system for much of the 2009 / 2010 school year.
Likely Case: (By “likely” I mean my own educated guess on roughly what seems to be the more probable outcome.) Some schools close due to spreading influenza, but most stay open. Lots of children are infected, but more children are seriously harmed by the vaccines than by the virus itself.
Best Case, Worst Case for the H1N1 swine flu severity
Best Case: The flu remains mild, killing no more people than season flu (which the CDC claims kills 30,000 Americans a year).
Worst Case: The flu quickly mutates to become resistant to both Tamiflu and the vaccines being given to people. It ramps up through December then hits hard in January and February when most people are vitamin D deficient. Over a billion people around the world become infected, and millions die.
Likely Case: While this is a very difficult prediction to make, I wouldn’t be surprised to see worldwide infections exceed one billion people. The total number of deaths is a wildcard. One million deaths worldwide from swine flu over the next two winters is not an unreasonable estimate based on historical accounts of pandemics.
Best Case, Worst Case for the Swine Flu Vaccine
Best Case: The vaccine performs as advertised by Big Pharma, protecting people from swine flu infections while harming no one.
Worst Case: The vaccine is worse than the swine flu itself. Rather than protecting people, it causes the death of many thousands (or even millions, if you subscribe to the population control theory on swine flu vaccines).
Likely Case: In my view, the vaccine itself is a real wildcard here. Testing has been extremely limited, and no long-term testing will be conducted at all before it is injected into people. The vaccine will most likely cause a few short-term deaths (people dying within 48 hours, for example), but the real issue may be the long-term risks of the vaccine. What happens six months later? Will it cause paralysis in some people? Will it harm immune system function or damage vital organs in a way that could not be detected in the short-term? That’s what I think the real risk is with the vaccine: What it does to you over time (if you survive the first 48 hours).
Best Case, Worst Case for the infrastructure of society
Best Case: Zero disruptions. A few people get sick, but they sleep it off and return to work. The power, water, public safety, food supplies and other key infrastructure components remain fully intact, barely skipping a beat.
Worst Case: Mad Max. Total collapse of complex society. The number of sick people surpasses a tipping point, leading to critical failures that cascade into larger failures. Before long, the complexity of modern society unravels, collapsing into a simpler society, along with a huge reduction in population from starvation and disease.
Likely Case: Temporary but serious disruptions in early 2010 as swine flu infections peak, sending a significant portion of the workforce home to recover. Expect random, local service outages and unpredictable delays in the delivery of food, fuel, and other essentials. Eventually, however, society will recover from the pandemic and go on to face other crises (such as the demise of the U.S. dollar and the looming debt crisis).
Best Case, Worst Case for hospitals and health care
Best Case: Few infections mean hospitals have plenty of capacity. The anti-viral drugs work well and the vaccines work as intended.
Worst Case: Hospitals overflow with the dead as local school gymnasiums are requisitioned for use as makeshift morgues (a la 1918). Hospitals become death zones where the virus spreads (and mutates). The virus quickly acquires immunity to Tamiflu while further mutations outflank all available vaccines. People attempting to enter hospitals are simply sent home to die.
Likely Case: Hospitals are stressed to near-breaking point status as infected patients flood into emergency rooms worldwide. Anti-viral drugs remain in short supply while hospitals become seriously short-staffed due to workers becoming infected themselves. Public service messages are aired to encourage infected patients to stay home and avoid flooding emergency rooms.
How to make it better for you in any case
Regardless of whether the “best case” or “worst case” scenario materializes (or something in between), note carefully that there is nothing mentioned here that you cannot survive if you’re well prepared.
Simply boosting your own health through the use of vitamin D, superfoods and targeted nutritional supplements can greatly increase your ability to stay off the “victim” lists and remain in control of your own health destiny. You can also insulate yourself against potential infrastructure failures quite easily through basic preparedness measures (food, water, heat, shelter, etc.) Check out our courses on pandemic preparedness to learn more on that topic: http://www.truthpublishing.com/Swin… and this audio program with Dr. Sheldon Marks: http://www.truthpublishing.com/Prod…
Simple preparedness will help keep you safe, healthy and confident no matter what the swine flu pandemic brings. That’s the real message here: Be prepared, not scared! Plan for things in advance and they won’t bite you back. The coming H1N1 pandemic is no different: It’s something you can see well in advance. So plan for it, and you most likely won’t be surprised and harmed by it.
When the virus surges this fall, nobody can honestly claim “I didn’t know!” Everybody knows it’s coming. Yet the vast majority will do nothing to prepare, blindly putting their trust and faith in a failed health care system that only seeks to extract profit from the pandemic rather than actually teaching people how to get healthy enough to survive on their own.
Don’t be part of the “do nothing” crowd. Prepare now, and you’ll thank your living, breathing self later. Hopefully, after the winter of 2009 / 2010, we can all take a look back at articles like this one and say thank goodness the worst case scenario never unfolded.






