Dairy Industry Pushing Chocolate Milk
November 9, 2009
Associated Press
Emily Fredrix
The creators of the “Got Milk?” campaign are getting ready to make a big push to keep chocolate milk on kids’ minds and on school lunch menus, a plan that has some educators and obesity activists none too pleased.
The new ad campaign from the dairy industry, set to launch Monday, emphasizes that sugary flavorings are ways to get kids to drink milk. Without them, some youngsters won’t drink regular milk and won’t get its nutrients, the ads say.
The “Raise your hand for chocolate milk” campaign starts Monday with an ad in USA Today featuring chocolatey brown colors and the launch of a Web site that asks people to sign a petition declaring their support for chocolate milk in school.
But some educators and obesity experts say kids get enough calcium — essential for bone growth — and will drink white milk if it’s the only milk offered. They say kids get too much sugar, which is heightening America’s obesity problem, and schools shouldn’t serve chocolate milk at all.
The idea behind the campaign is to draw a distinction between chocolate milk and the soda and candy that have come under attack in schools, said Vivien Godfrey, CEO of the Milk Processor Education Program, the industry marketing group that developed the campaign with the National Dairy Council. Godfrey said the effort will cost between $500,000 and $1 million.
She said most kids choose chocolate milk, but without it they drink juice, soda or water, which don’t have the same nutrients. The facts — that chocolate milk does have nutrients — are getting lost in the debate over school lunches, she said.
“If there’s even a chance chocolate milk might get taken out of schools, that really can do more harm than good,” she said.
It’s not clear how many schools have chocolate milk or are pulling it. But parents and school districts are becoming increasingly concerned and asking for more information, said Margie Saidel, a vice president with Chartwells School Dining Services, which manages food programs in 600 districts and supports chocolate milk.
But experts like Marlene Schwartz, deputy directory of the Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity at Yale University, want chocolate milk tossed. She said kids have too much sugar already and chocolate milk has no place in schools.
Least Healthy Breakfast Cereals
October 26, 2009
ABC News
By Dan Harris, Joel Siegel, Christine Brouwer and Suzanne Yeo
Six hundred and forty-two times a year. That is how often the average American preschooler sees an advertisement for cereal, according to a new study by Yale University.
So it puts things in perspective when the same study says that cereals with the biggest marketing push also happen to be among the least nutritious, when analyzed using a nutrient profiling system developed at Oxford University.
“If one looks at the rank order list of the worst nutrition cereals it’s stunning how the worst cereals are marketed so aggressively to children,” Kelly Brownell, a co-author of the study, said.
ABC News obtained an advance copy of the study, which will be released Monday when the Obesity Society holds its annual meeting in Washington. The study’s authors are posting their findings at CerealFacts.org.
The scathing report by the Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity says it provides proof for parents that children will eat unsweetened cereals if they are offered.
“So, there are ways to train kids to eat healthier food, it’s all about what they’re exposed to,” Brownell said.
Co-Author: Children Are ‘Blitzed by Marketing’
Advertisers have found new ways to expose children to their products. At sillyrabbit.com, Trix cereal goes far beyond its old television spot featuring a bouncing rabbit and the slogan, “Trix Are for Kids!” The site gives children entree to a colorful “Trix World” where they can play a bowling game at “Fruitalicious Lanes” or explore a “Rabbitropolis” that has a movie theater showing “Trix Toons.”
“You could use the word ‘assault’ to talk about the way the marketing is going on,” Brownell told ABC News. “Children are just blitzed by marketing for the least healthy food products, and there’s very little marketing for healthy ones to offset it.”
Brownell added, “If you add up all the exposure, on the Internet, billboards, television, what they see in stores, sales, what they’re going to see in … the social media like Facebook, it’s just enormous exposure.”
Three years ago, the industry announced with some fanfare that it would police itself by setting new standards for the way it markets food for kids.
Under the industry’s new standards many of the least nutritional cereals qualify as “better for you” foods, something Brownell called a “demonstrable failure.”
“To hear Froot Loops advertised as a ‘better for you’ food is to me just laughable,” said David Ludwig, director of the Optimal Weight for Life Program at Children’s Hospital in Boston.
“There’s something seriously wrong with a nutritional rating system if Froot Loops comes out looking good. This is really like rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic.”
Brownell says this only adds to the growing childhood obesity problem and calls today’s food environment “toxic” for children.
Industry Pushes Back Against Report
Elanie Kolish, of the Children’s Food and Beverage Advertising Initiative who oversees the industry’s self-regulation initiative, disagrees with Brownell’s findings.
“Well, I don’t know how they came to their conclusion that they are the least nutritional products. Because children’s cereals that are advertised in our program are low in calories & and they provide an important source of these nutrients for kids’ diets,” Kolish said. Kolish’s statement is echoed by others in the industry.
“From a calorie and nutrient standpoint, cereal may be the best breakfast choice you could make. In fact, kids who eat cereal more frequently, including presweetened cereals, tend to weigh less than kids who eat cereal less frequently — and they are better nourished,” said General Mills spokeswoman Heidi Geller. General Mills produces Reese’s Puffs, Lucky Charms, Cinnamon Toast Crunch, Trix and Cookie Crisp, among others.
Kellogg spokesman Kris Charles said the company developed a Global Nutrient Criteria; children’s cereals that did not meet the new standard were reformulated, or the company stopped marketing them to children under 12. Charles added that from 2006-09, Kellogg reduced its advertising to children under 12 by about 50 percent. Among Kellogg’s cereals for kids are Corn Pops and Froot Loops.
PepsiCo, which owns Quaker and Cap’n Crunch, said it is working to further improve the nutrition profile of that cereal.
“As an industry leader in responsible children’s marketing, PepsiCo is making ongoing efforts to voluntarily apply a rigorous transformation of its portfolio to meet consumer needs, including products like Cap’n Crunch cereal,” spokeswoman Candace Mueller told ABC News.
Top ten advertised cereals to children with poorest nutrition rating, according to the Cereal F.A.C.T.S report
1. Reese’s Puffs
2. Corn Pops
3. Lucky Charms
4. Cinnamon Toast Crunch (tied)
4. Cap’n Crunch (tied)
6. Trix (tied)
6. Froot Loops (tied)
6. Fruity and Cocoa Pebbles (tied)
9. Cocoa Puffs
10. Cookie Crisp
Click here for the full report.
