Bill Gates Funds Covert Vaccine Nanotechnology
May 28, 2010 by admin
Filed under News Stories
May 28, 2010
May 28, 2010
By Mike Adams
(NaturalNews) The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is gaining a reputation for funding technologies designed to roll out mass sterilization and vaccination programs around the world. One of the programs recently funded by the foundation is a sterilization program that would use sharp blasts of ultrasound directed against a man’s scrotum to render him infertile for six months. It might accurately be called a “temporary castration” technology.
Now, the foundation has funded a new “sweat-triggered vaccine delivery” program based on nanoparticles penetrating human skin. The technology is describes as a way to “…develop nanoparticles that penetrate the skin through hair follicles and burst upon contact with human sweat to release vaccines.”
The research grant money is going to Carlos Alberto Guzman of the Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research in Germany and Claus-Michael Lehr and Steffi Hansen of the Helmholtz-Institute for Pharmaceutical Research.
Click here for the full report.
The Kevin Trudeau Show: 5-26-10
Today, Kevin explains how government corruption goes beyond your comprehension and what you can do to help him in his fight for the truth!! Plus, the author of the famous book, Men are from Mars, Women are From Venus, John Gray, Ph.D., stops by to give you the REAL reason you may be having marriage problems.
Meet Kevin!!
Health Freedom Expo
Natural Cures Health Institute
Self Help:
Fountain of Youth
Live Cell Therapy
Maximize Your Downline
Health:
Big Pharma Leaves Deadly Warnings Out of Ads
FDA Investigates Serious Tylenol Recall
Ultrasounds Harmful To Fetus
Heartburn Drugs Now Come With Fracture Risk
Fizzy Drinks Increase Chance of Stroke
Sunscreen Linked To Cancer
Beer Belly Linked To Alzheimer’s
Canned Food May Expose People to BPA
Viagra Causes Hearing Loss
Toddlers Given Unapproved Antipsychotics
Doctor Beats Swine Flu with Vitamin D
Wealth:
Jobless Claims Hit 3 Month High
Mortgage Delinquencies Far From Over
Government:
Another Government Attempt To Kill Alternative Medicine
Everything Kevin:
Become An Insider!
Support Kevin!
Kevin is on YouTube!
Sign Up For Kevin’s FREE Podcast
Follow Kevin on Twitter
Become Kevin’s Friend on Facebook
Kevin’s Film Club
Kevin’s Book Club
Take Trudeau on the Go! Click here to download this show to your iPod, mp3 player, or PC through iTunes!
Click below to watch LIVE VIDEO from the show!
Ultrasounds Are Harmful To The Fetus
May 24, 2010 by admin
Filed under News Stories
May 24, 2010
NaturalNews.com
by Mike Adams
Ultrasound is extremely damaging to the health of any unborn child (fetus). The natural health community has been warning about ultrasound for years, but mainstream medicine, which consistently fails to recognize the harm it causes, insists ultrasound is perfectly safe and can’t possibly harm the health of a fetus.
Now, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is funding a project that aims to temporarily sterilize men by blasting their scrotums with ultrasound. The burst of ultrasound energy, it turns out, disrupts the normal biological function of the testes, making the man infertile for six months.
Ultrasound, in other words, contains enough energy to temporarily deaden the testes and basically destroy sperm function for half a year. So why is it considered “safe” to blast an unborn baby with the same frequencies?
Ultrasound is loud. It no doubt causes tissue disruption and damage in a fetus, and it certainly creates stress and shock for the baby. And yet conceited yuppie parents just can’t get enough of it! They want to SEE a picture of their little baby before it’s even born, so they subject it to tissue damage and ultrasound trauma in order to get a snapshot they can show off to their yuppie friends. Just to clarify, I’m not opposed to medically necessary ultrasound that has a reasonable justification concerning the health of the mother of the baby. What I’m strongly opposed to is ultrasound used to take pictures of the fetus or to satisfy the curiosity of the parents. This “recreational” ultrasound is extremely selfish, conceited and may pose a very real danger to the health of the baby.
It’s so American, isn’t it? Damage the baby so we can get a snapshot to post on Facebook. What a way to welcome a baby into the world: Blast it with piercing high-frequency energy in order to impress your friends! Don’t forget to vaccinate them, too, as soon as they are born. (And yes, some parents-to-be seriously subject their babies to ultrasound just so they can take pictures. It’s demented!)
Sound is very easily transmitted through fluids, by the way, and the fetus is floating in a sac of amniotic fluid that transmits the ultrasound energy right at them.
Click here to continue reading the full report
Study: Chest Ultrasound as Effective and Safer than CT Scan
November 24, 2009 by admin
Filed under News Stories
November 20, 2009
Eureka Alert
Chest ultrasound can serve as a viable alternative to chest CT in the evaluation of pediatric patients with complicated pneumonia and parapneumonic effusion (a build-up of fluid between the lung and chest wall), according to a study published in the December issue of the American Journal of Roentgenology.
Pneumonia in the pediatric population is common. Both the diagnosis and therapy of complicated pneumonia is guided by imaging — CT, to date, playing a central role in complicated cases.
In the study, performed at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center in the Bronx, N.Y., both chest CT and chest ultrasound were performed on 19 children with complicated pneumonia accompanied by parapneumonic effusion. “Our results showed that chest CT did not provide additional clinically useful information that was not also seen on chest ultrasound,” said Terry L. Levin, M.D., lead author of the study.
“No consensus exists on the optimal technique for imaging complicated pneumonia in children. Although chest CT allows rapid image acquisition, the rising use of CT in the pediatric population raises the concern of an increasing ionizing radiation burden,” said Levin. “The benefits of chest ultrasound over chest CT include its portability, absence of need for patient sedation, and that ultrasound does not use ionizing radiation,” she said.
“As a result of our study, we suggest that the evaluation of children with complicated pneumonia include chest radiography and chest ultrasound. Chest CT may be reserved for patients in whom chest ultrasound is technically difficult or discrepant with the clinical findings,” said Levin.
